Kptn Singh wrote: Thanks for deleting my earlier post
Hopefully I have made my point clear
use judgement before using vulgar language in the Forum or in game
moderators should not use their power to defend vulgar language but should assist in stopping
whoever (seasoned ace or newbie) is engaging in it.
thanks again for deleting that post, Wig, please delete the post quoting me as well. If you wish
you can delete the original post as well.
Kptn
Just to clarify a few things for everyone.
- When Kptn Singh first reported Doggs' on here, the description was limited to the SOB comment. Nothing further. I even PM'd Singh that we'll keep an eye out, but that comment alone wasn't abusive IMO (and actually, I never said anything about passing to Wig, but that's beside the point). If a player went on and on about another person's mother in separate and specific rants, THAT's abusive. But Singh didn't report it as such. Note that a player could avoid all vulgar terms and still be abusive, depending on context; and a player could use a few bad words (my personal view is that list is very short) without being abusive, again, depending on context. That is why communicating context (what was said, how was warned, how they responded) is important if you want us to act on a report.
- My interpretation of Wig's response is along those lines. Singh is correct in that no moderator should use power to defend vulgar language. IMO, Wig's post works well whether posted as a moderator or simply as a player, and was expressing the point above, with additional context and positive history supporting Doggs.
- That said, if a player DOES get abusive and someone reports that here, I (and I think I can speak for all the mods) don't care WHAT squad he or she is from. In fact, after the moderators get done with the person, the squad should lay into them (assuming they still have an active account). My read is that Wig was pointing out that doggs has a history of fair play and good manners that supported the exclamatory as a brief vent of frustration, rather than a personal insult or abuse.
- We should all note that our own cultural differences will sometimes lead to variations in interpretation. I'm a transplant here, but in my parents' culture, that particular name-call could be interpreted as really throwing down the gauntlet. And other terms that I now think are totally harsh are considered quite tame there. Anyway, we'll work out some happy medium. But I do understand your reaction Singh; however it's likely that it wasn't his intent, at least from what's been posted.
- It's true that we are trying to keep it ALL clean since there are kids here, but there's some distance from the goal line that needs to be accepted as reality.
It's too bad (and a little strange) that Doggs/Doghouse666 is not responding. That would certainly have cleared things up. But it doesn't look like he a frequent poster, so maybe it's not that odd.
Manfred