I like the first list better Blue, I was on it at least...

[*M]RAPTOR wrote: I like the first list better Blue, I was on it at least...

You are there on the third page at Srl.No.-119


Note: Thank you for letting me know. Updated the third page.

Why is "Explained by Cricket" at the top of the page?

And why the weights to wins and hangars over kills? Just asking for clarity.

RT wrote: And why the weights to wins and hangars over kills? Just asking for clarity.

This stat was asked by cricket and he only let me know the formula. According to him this formula is used in baseball game to measure the effectiveness of player. As the same is explained by cricket, I put his name on top.

As explained by: Cricket

As explained by: Cricket

As explained by: Cricket

Ty

As explained by: Cricket

I think this is a very poor measurement of success. Having played with most of these people, I assure you that the most dangerous are those you have ranked much lower. This means the formula is bull cocky.

Dunc7 wrote: I think this is a very poor measurement of success. Having played with most of these people, I assure you that the most dangerous are those you have ranked much lower. This means the formula is bull cocky.

Dunc,

This formula takes into account the figures from starting (when a player starts playing this game) till date. So it will definitely differ from combined stats which is only for 15/16 days max. Many players have stopped playing but they still hold good to remind us how brilliantly they played/playing in their/present time. With time they will be superseded by players who constantly perform well like zebraup, jimmy. These two I know are quite below the position they are holding now but gradually they are moving up. Same you will find in world ranking. You must be knowing BlueMax, a legend who is undoubtedly the bestest player of dogfight as on date irrespective of not playing for so long but still holding the 9 position. Its combination of all stats but from beginning of players day 1.

To me it's well derived and if you see the formula it's taken the most important components into account. So to me its hold good.

See the stats of Worstwolf and Werewulf they are currently the best upcoming pilots and no one can forget about Destroyer the deadly beast who's current priority is studies but when he was here he is and will remain a terror among Red(s). So the formula is taking care of every exceptionally excellent players.

For current period you can visit Combined Stats Position (CSP) page (click here) in which you performed brilliantly but that is only for last 15 days and the position of regular and good players will change every fortnightly.

So one has to consistently perform well and see his position go up in sluggish stats too.

I still disagree. Factoring in the first part of a learning curve as a predictor of later success skews the results. All it does is make it take longer for the truth to show. I think you would get better results by removing all stats prior to, say, 10,000 kills or more. However, I do appreciate the effort it took whoever did this, and thank you for taking the time to discuss it with me.

As explained by: Cricket

As explained by: Cricket

[NLR] The Blue Fighter wrote:

As explained by: Cricket

Slugging Percentage or SLG %.

It measures a players power/effectiveness. The higher the better.

The formula is kills + (wins x 2) + (hangars x 3) / (deaths x 10)

yay, the coolest thread every has come back

i second that emotion

BULLET [M]isfit wrote:

[NLR] The Blue Fighter wrote:

As explained by: Cricket

Slugging Percentage or SLG %.

It measures a players power/effectiveness. The higher the better.

The formula is kills + (wins x 2) + (hangars x 3) / (deaths x 10)

yay, the coolest thread every has come back